BEIJING, March 27 (Xinhuanet) -- The disclosure of
3.6 million U.S. dollars in hidden tobacco money behind a big study suggesting
that lung scans might help save smokers from cancer has shocked the research
community and raised fresh concern about industry influence in important
science.
Two medical journals that published studies by Weill
Cornell Medical College researchers in 2006 are looking into tobacco cash and
other financial ties that weren't revealed. The studies reported benefits from
lung scans, which the Cornell team has long touted.
Many were stunned to learn that a foundation Cornell
set up and listed in the New England Journal of Medicine in October 2006 as a
sponsor of the study actually got 3.6 million dollars from a parent company of
cigarette maker Liggett Group Inc. The tobacco source was reported in a New York
Times story Wednesday.
It's a crucial public health issue: Dozens of groups,
including such anti-smoking crusaders as the American Cancer Society, have given
the Cornell team money to see if routinely screening smokers with CT scans can
spot the world's most lethal cancer in time to prevent deaths.
Scientists must maintain the trust of patients in
research studies, and "any breach of that trust is not simply disappointing but,
I believe, unacceptable," Dr. John Niederhuber, director of the National Cancer
Institute, said in a statement.
Liggett, whose owner was the first to break with
other tobacco companies and say that tobacco was addictive and deadly, announced
its donation to the Cornell foundation in 2000 in a press release. But the
foundation's funding source wasn't disclosed to the journal.
On Wednesday, company spokeswoman Carrie Bloom noted
in a statement that the company "had no control or influence over the research."
The chief Cornell researcher, Dr. Claudia Henschke,
did not respond to an e-mail requesting comment. Cornell's dean, Dr. Antonio
Gotto, said: "The claim that we set this foundation up in order to cover up the
money just isn't true. We made a public announcement that we were taking the
money from the tobacco company."
(Agencies)